In SYSmark 2014 a 12% score improvement is measured while WebXPRT shows a 19% advantage. In these two examples, Intel compares the 15 watt Core i7-6500U (a common part in currently shipping notebooks) and the upcoming 15 watt Core i7-7500U, both with dual-core HyperThreaded configurations. Sustained clocks will very likely remain voltage / thermally limited but the ability spike up to higher clocks for even short bursts can improve performance and responsiveness of Kaby Lake when compared to Skylake. In general, we are looking at 300-400 MHz higher peak clock speeds in Turbo Boost situations when compared to similar TDP products in the 6 th generation. That process improvement directly results in higher clock speeds for Kaby Lake when compared to Skylake when running at the same target TDPs. The result is a 12% increase in process performance that is a sizeable gain in a fairly tight time frame even for Intel. The term “same” will be debated as well as Intel claims that improvements made in the process technology over the last 24 months have allowed them to expand clock speeds and improve on efficiencyĭubbing this new revision of the process as “14nm+”, Intel tells me that they have improved the fin profile for the 3D transistors as well as channel strain while more tightly integrating the design process with manufacturing. It is a valid but arguable criticism, but Intel is making changes in other areas that should make KBL an improvement in the thin and light ecosystem.Īlso worth noting is that Intel is still building Kaby Lake on 14nm process technology, the same used on Skylake. Instructions per clock (IPC) remain the same with the exception of dedicated hardware changes in the media engine, so you should not expect any performance differences with Kaby Lake except with improved clock speeds we’ll discuss in a bit.īecause of this lack of change many people will look down on the Kaby Lake release as Intel’s attempt to repackage an existing product to make sure it meets a financial market required annual product cadence. At its core, the microarchitecture of Kaby Lake is identical to that of Skylake. Let’s dive into this topic with a simple and straight forward mindset in how it compares to Skylake.Īctually, quite a lot. Today Intel released new information about the 7 th Gen CPU family and Kaby Lake.
KABY LAKE PROCSSOR PC
We have been seeing and reporting on the details of Kaby Lake for quite some time here on PC Perspective – it became a more important topic when we realized that this would be the product that officially killed off the ‘tick-tock’ design philosophy that Intel had implemented years ago and that was responsible for much of the innovation in the CPU space over the last decade. While spending time learning about upcoming products and technologies at the Intel Developer Forum earlier this month, I sat down with the company to learn about the release of Kaby Lake, now known as the 7 th Generation Core processor family. Option: Kaby Lake Core i7-4610Y CPU 2.What’s new and what’s not Intel is finally coming clean about the 7th Generation Core processors, Kaby Lake. Option: Kaby Lake Core i5-4302Y CPU 2.3 GHz Turbo Option: Kaby Lake Core i3-4012Y CPU 1.5 GHz base ProcessorIntel Kaby Lake – Core Pentium Processor RuggednessIP52 Waterproof (Front Panel Only)ĭrop Rate: 4FT Drop Resistant – Corners on Plywood (MIL-STD-810G) A large, high definition screen and a variety of options make this the perfect choice for any semi-permanent application. VESA mounting is for wheelchairs, computer carts, and more. The medical grade chassis and IP52 waterproof front screen are easily disinfected. The MT-140 Semi-Rugged Tablet is a 14″ Intel powered tablet for medical/commercial uses. 14″, Intel-Powered, Commercial/Medical Tablet PC
0 kommentar(er)
